Quarterlies are usually seen as some form of celebratory or
focal point. I’m not sure if Speed 2 Month can be seen as a celebration as such,
though I’m prepared to call 25 days of dishonoring a massive failure in
entertainment and money spending something akin to that. Certainly not a
tribute, but possibly Un-tribute.
I had no real plan on what to celebrate today, other than
trying to locate a film that would once again show up the defects in SPEED 2,
and maybe in the creation process of it as well. I think, after a quick
internet brainstorm session with the IMDB (www.imdb.com), I located what I
needed to make it one more day of procrastinating the eventual Nic Cage
blather.
1989 was a great year in film. Ron Howard had a massive hit
with PARENTHOOD, Oliver Stone made waves with BORN ON THE 4TH OF
JULY, Stephen Soderbergh cracked the arthouse market with SEX, LIES, AND
VIDEOTAPE and Rob Reiner created a whole new focus group with the release of
WHEN HARRY MET SALLY. Smaller noteworthy movies were pumped out, some just
barely touching the big screen before hitting the burgeoning home video market,
like Rutger Hauer in BLIND FURY, Tim Robbins and a few of the Monty Python boys
in ERIK THE VIKING and Denzel Washington in THE MIGHTY QUINN, a really cool
picture, if you haven’t seen it. On the sequel table came BACK TO THE FUTURE
II, STAR TREK V: THE FINAL FRONTIER, the third in the Indiana Jones series,
KARATE KID III, the continuing misadventures of the Griswold family with
NATIONAL LAMPOON’S CHRISTMAS VACATION, the second Fletch movie, the second in
the Lethal Weapon series, another Bond movie in LISCENCE TO KILL, the unneeded
FOOD OF THE GODS II, and the target of today’s missive, GHOSTBUSTERS II.
It’s pretty clear sequel-itis had hit Hollyweird pretty hard
by ’89, and would continue to do so for the next few years. Just looking at
other movies released during the year and you see other, smaller hits that
begat sequels. GHOSTBUSTERS II was released 5 years after that of the original,
gigantic hit. It was apparently pressure from the studio that initiated this
sequel. Considering the money to be made from what had already become a
merchandising mountain, it’s not hard to see why. The entire main cast returned
to reprise their parts, though it was difficult getting some to sign up, memory
serves. It is here I wish my magazine collection was digitized to pop in
articles of the nature… but you’ll just have to trust me that the malts and
barley haven’t damaged the noggin all that much.
Regardless, they all came back to a tale that sees the
Ghostbusters far from the heroes they were in ’84, now relegated to making
money where they can, such as kiddie birthday parties. Things start picking up
quickly as a haunted painting of a 16th century nutcase begins to
push emotion-effecting ectoplasm throughout the city of New York. Lord Vigo
(the dead nutcase) wants to return to Earth by commandeering the baby of Dana
(Sigourney Weaver), Venkman’s (Bill Murray) love interest from the previous
movie. Bang, crash, boom, the Ghostbusters are needed to save the day, and they
do, with some spectacularly similar events to the first story. Yawn.
GHOSTBUSTERS was made for 30 million and raked in 291
million back in ’84, one of the biggest hits since the last Star Wars flick
then. GHOSTBUSTERS II was made for 37 million, not that big a bump, considering
the size of the cast, and made over 215 million. Surprisingly, it was seen as a
disappointment monetarily. While it may not have pulled in the same numbers, it’s
still pretty damned good, considering the overall costs. I mean, SPEED cost
around 30 million and raked in 350 million years later. SPEED 2… well… we know
the massive budget jump that stinker got, and the splat it made at the box
office. So, while there is no real budget comparison of GHOSTBUSTERS II to
SPEED 2, there certainly is in plot.
In GHOSTBUSTERS II, the Ghostbusters must come together to
save New York City from danger. Basically the same plot as the first movie, the
only difference is what they must overcome to get together. In SPEED 2, the…
well, I’ll call them the heroes… must save a cruise ship from smashing into a
tanker and blowing up. In SPEED, the heroes must save a busload of passengers
from blowing up. Not so much different there, just in the setting and the why
of it (and the acting and overall story and the…). The real difference, since
GHOSTBUSTERS II isn’t a great film, is in why it’s better than SPEED 2. It’s
not a funny movie, like the first one was. It’s not new in what the characters
are doing; in fact, there are almost scene-for-scene correlations to the
original. The cast is so big you can’t get good representation of them all and
actually wish you did. Between the original and II, there was an animated
series that became known as THE REAL GHOSTBUSTERS (I should tell the tale of
that title sometime, it’s interesting). It was a huge hit, creating more
merchandising than even the first movie. It did much to develop the four main
characters, it seemed as if GHOSTBUSTERS II was either stealing from that show
or avoiding parts of it. It was hard to say, unless you were a viewer of the
cartoon. If you weren’t, that was not going to help you with this picture. Not
helpful, for a sequel of standards that didn’t surpass the original.
GHOSTBUSTERS II is
better than SPEED 2, regardless of its own failures. It has the original cast,
including secondary characters. It has Harris Yulin, who just knows how to
bellow above and beyond many other actors (he played the angry judge). It has
real cameos by other actors. It has Harold Ramis, genius. It has Peter MacNichol,
who just runs away with the one-liners as the art historian in charge of Lord
Vigo’s painting. I’m thinking that if it weren’t for MacNichol, this movie would
have never been remembered.
Peter MacNichol. Jason Patric. You decide.